Rise or Fall?
As one new book predicts the decline of cities, another describes their revival.
BY ALEX MARSHALL
The City: A Global History
By Joel Kotkin
Modern Library, $21.95
Intown Living: A Different
American Dream
By Ann Breen and Dick Rigby
Island Press, $24.95
To make a classic French veal glace
de viande, the chef must boil down great amounts
of liquid until only a few cups of concentrated flavor
remain. Writer Joel Kotkin performs a similar yet
far more prodigious feat in his new book: reducing
the city, whose history stretches for 7,000 or so
years over most of human civilization, into a slim
160 pages. The City: A Global History is the
latest installment in the Modern Library Chronicles,
a series of compact volumes about big subjects.
From the Sumerians at Ur in 3000 B.C.
to the newly industrializing Chinese in Shanghai today,
Kotkin synthesizes an astonishing range of materials
into a story that moves across time, place, and culture.
Who knew, for example, that World War II-era Japanese
leaders attempted to set up English-style garden cities
in the conquered territories of China, complete with
regional greenbelts? Or that Baghdad was perhaps the
world's largest city in the ninth century, with some
250,000 people?
Nevertheless, Kotkin's achievement
ends up a bit dry and at times deficient. Although
he tries to develop characters, he simply doesn't
have the space, and the reader is often left with
a blur of names and dates. His narrative is so condensed
that he disposes of the sweeping transformation of
19th-century Paris by planner Baron Georges-Eugène
Haussmann in a mere two sentences.
Historically, Kotkin asserts, cities
have provided security, a place for markets, and a place
for sacred spaces. "Where these factors are present,
urban culture flourishes," he writes. "When these elements
weaken, cities dissipate and eventually recede out of
history." I think Kotkin makes too much of the role
of sacred spaces. Like museums and art galleries, churches
and temples are found in most cities, but that doesn't
mean that cities necessarily depend on them for their
existence. In fact, the author himself notes several
cities, past and present, lacking in sacred space, among
them 20th-century New York.
What Kotkin misses in his trilogy is
creativity. Cities have arguably endured and succeeded
because they produce valuable schools of industry,
art, and intellect based on the interactions of their
residents. The renowned urban planner Sir Peter Hall
explores this in a very different book published in
1998, the 1,200-page Cities in Civilization,
in which he argues that unique urban epochs were essential
to producing the philosophy of ancient Athens, the
impressionist paintings of 19th-century Paris, and
the computer chips of Silicon Valley. Kotkin seems
to attribute such achievements to distinct national
cultures instead.
Toward the end of The City,
Kotkin spotlights a disturbing trend: Mexico City,
Lagos (Nigeria's largest city), and other vast mega-cities
of the poor keep on growing in Asia, Africa, and Latin
America. "In many cases, this huge expansion of cities
occurred without a corresponding increase in either
wealth or power," writes Kotkin. "Such a development
represents a tragic and fateful break in urban history."
The urban theorist Mike Davis, an avowed Marxist,
focuses on this trend in his soon-to-be-published
Planet of Slums, and it seems significant that
Kotkin—who often contributes to The Weekly Standard
and other conservative publications—sees a similar
reality.
Writing on the wealthier countries,
Kotkin is faintly disapproving of cities that he labels
"ephemeral"—cities like London, Montreal, and San
Francisco that have "culturally-based" economies with
extensive tourism sectors. These cities' once-struggling
central districts now boast "loft developments, good
restaurants, clubs, museums, and a sizable, visible
gay and single population," factors that may lead
to a revival but, Kotkin predicts, "hardly with anything
remotely reminiscent of the past economic dynamism."
Actually, "ephemeral cities" have produced much of
the wealth of the past two decades because of their
dominance of the computer industry, finance, and the
media.
Given his views on such places, Kotkin
might think it a waste of time to devote a whole book
to them—which is essentially what Ann Breen and Dick
Rigby do. Their volume, Intown Living: A Different
American Dream, roughly the same length as Kotkin's,
argues that vibrant, cultivated downtowns have helped
revitalize cities as different as Houston, Portland,
Ore., Atlanta, Vancouver, and Minneapolis.
In a series of case studies, Breen
and Rigby set out the distinct history and typology
of each center-city district. Their range is broad,
from Houston's midtown—a small area of garden apartments
set amid limitless sprawl—to Portland's Pearl district,
just one of many vital neighborhoods within this paragon
of American urbanism. The authors compare how the
cities have navigated the shoals and trade winds of
urban renewal, convention centers, mass transit, beltways,
and freeways, all with varying degrees of success.
In The City, Kotkin cites the
continued growth of the suburbs as proof that city
centers will decline. Breen and Rigby signal a more
likely path, that cities will become the glittering
capstones atop large metropolitan areas, as vital
and indispensable as the apex of a pyramid.
Read more excerpts from
our current
issue online, look for the July/August
2005 issue on newsstands, e-mail
us to purchase a copy, or subscribe
to the magazine.
|