Fading Fast
Painted Wall Signs Are Disappearing, But Is Restoration the Answer?

Story from the archives by Elliott Joseph / Apr. 20, 2007

Printer-friendly
version

 |
| A restored advertisement in Oakland, Calif. (Roz Joseph)
|
In the heart of Chinatown
in Oakland, Calif., there is an old advertising sign that lookslike
new. In fact, it is. The "MJB Coffee WHY?" sign, prominently
displayed on the side of a century-old building, was first painted in
1906 but was redone 10 years ago.
The owners of the building were able to get a grant from
the MJB Coffee Company, through the Oakland Museum, to repaint the sign
in its original colors. The sign was one of dozens that had been painted
on walls throughout California for the company, which wanted to pique
people's curiosity about their java.
Across the bay in San Francisco, on a building that houses
the Victoria Theater, another old advertising wall sign was revitalized
20 years ago. The 1920 "Albers Flapjack Flour" sign had deteriorated
so much that painters had to find photographs of the original wall from
the Carnation Company, which owned Albers. Although the black-and-white
photographs showed the miner's facial expression and other details on
the ad, painters had to guess the mural's colors.
 |
| Restored in Oakland (Roz Joseph) |
These renewed signs are among the exceptions, however. Thousands
of others in cities, towns, and rural areas across America are not as
fortunate. They are doomed, either by destruction of the buildings that
are their canvasses, a fresh coat of paint, or weather and time.
For instance, San Francisco's "Get Kist for a Nickel"
sign, whose provocative message promoted the soft drink for more than
40 years, is gone. In the otherwise beautifully preserved town of Nevada
City, Calif., the landmark "Rose Fashion Shoppe" wall sign can
barely be read. Exposed to the elements for almost a century, it is simply
fading away.
Created for commercial purposes on brick, concrete and other
canvasses, old painted wall signs may have lost their powers of persuasion,
but they have taken on a value of their own as American artifacts.
 |
|
Lost in San Francisco (Roz Joseph)
|
One of the companies that painted walls was the California
firm of Foster and Kleiser. Before it was purchased by another company
in 1953, when the service was discontinued, the company had painted walls
in hundreds of cities in the Western states. The service was called the
"special paint" department, says Joseph Blackstock, director
of research at the Patrick Media Group, Inc., the company's current owners.
"The term 'special paint' was probably more accurate
in the years following World War II," Blackstock says, "because
we painted on other surfaces as well as on regular walls. We might paint
designs on water towers or reservoirs or indeed do murals in commercial
establishments."
Almost all outdoor advertising companies offered a wall-painting
service in the early years. The paint was usually brightly colored, and
signs were painted once a year, sometimes twice or more. Affectionately
known as "wall dogs," the painters had to work with many kinds
of surfaces.
 |
| (Roz Joseph) |
"Some of the surfaces were so bad," Blackstock
says, "they would wear out good brushes in a day or two. Another
factor was the weather. In Seattle and Portland, much of the painting
had to be done in the rain. In Tucson and Phoenix, it was often in temperatures
of over 100 degrees."
The cost of painted advertisements was surprisingly low.
In 1929, they ranged from $15 to $50 per month for a three-year contract
in heavily trafficked areas, with exceptionally busy locations going for
$100 per month. Ten years later, the company sold advertisements for as
little as $9 per month and as much as $250. More than a few new products
got their start on walls ads: Coca-Cola, Signal Oil, and Canada Dry.
In addition to using walls in cities, enterprising tobacco
companies sent their representatives to rural areas to convince farmers
to allow the sides of their barns to become advertisements. One of the
most successful companies to do this was Mail Pouch. By the turn of the
century, messages like "Chew Mail Pouch Tobacco: Treat Yourself to
the Best" started to appear on barns everywhere.
"In the early days, the farmer was offered his choice
of being paid for the advertising space with money, tobacco, or magazine
subscriptions," says Mary Ruth Whorton of the Helme Tobacco Company,
which now owns the Mail Pouch brand. Whorton tells the story of a British
celebrity arriving in New York who was asked what he thought America was
most famous for. Without a moment's hesitation, he replied, "Good-looking
women and Mail Pouch Tobacco signs."
 |
|
One of the many Mail Pouch Tobacco signs
(Roz Joseph)
|
At first, local sign painters were given the rural jobs.
Later, by the 1930s, the firm of William and Ed Burner were handling all
the contracts?as many as 17,000 barns, walls and billboards. The 1965
Highway Beautification Act forced Mail Pouch to paint over many of its
ads, since signs within 660 feet of interstate and federally aided highways
are now prohibited. In former days, it took about three years to cover
all of the territories.
Currently, Helme employs one part-time person to paint signs
in Ohio, West Virginia, Western Pennsylvania and Western Maryland. They
are repainted every five to six years, and new locations are rarely added.
Painting walls is a tradition as old as Pompeii. In old
wall signs convey a time that can never return, when milk was delivered
to the door, when flappers danced the Charleston and a penny bought a
salted pretzel or a jaw-challenging gumball. Is restoring them an option?
Some say that those who attempt to restore these ads change them in the
process. They look too new, too crisp, too fresh, and too out of place,
as if we are expected to take their original message seriously. There
is something to be said for keeping those that remain in a state of arrested
decay.
"I loved those old wall signs," Blackstock says,
"and was greatly disappointed when our company discontinued them."
Elliott Joseph's articles and fiction have appeared in
McCall's, Harper's Bazaar, the San Francisco Examiner, and
elsewhere. He teaches at the College of Marin.
Sign
up for our free weekly e-newsletter >>
Recent Stories
How TDRs can help and hurt historic buildings
- Apr. 13, 2007
How Lancaster County preserves its farmland
- Apr. 6, 2007
A California playground gets a second chance
- Mar. 30, 2007
Searching for Japantown
- Mar. 23, 2007
Lost ballparks
- Mar. 16, 2007
Before & After
- Mar. 9, 2007
Saving the gardens of Alcatraz
- Mar. 2, 2007
More
preservation groups offer classes to real-estate agents
- Feb. 23, 2007
One
man's dream to restore a Little Rock neighborhood
- Feb. 16, 2007
What
one city did with its farm on Chicago's North Shore
- Feb. 9, 2007
What will happen to historic military bases set to close in four years? - Feb. 2, 2007
Lost
in L.A. - Jan. 26, 2007
Surfers,
erosion, and New York's oldest lighthouse
- Jan. 19, 2007
The
automats, once a New York institution, are dying out
- Jan. 12, 2007
New
Orleans activists blog against unwarranted demolitions
- Jan. 5, 2007
Best & Worst of 2006
- Dec. 29, 2006
More
Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>
|