Home
Subscribe
About the Trust
Advertising
About Us
Search


 
Wide Open Spaces
Colorado Opposes the Army's Plans to Expand a Base.

Story by Tovah Pentelovitch / Aug. 17, 2007

 Printer-friendly version

Colorado
The army plans to take historic ranches, petroglyphs, and part of the Santa Fe trail, prompting the National Trust to name Pinon Canyon one of America's 11 Most Endangered Places this year. (NTHP)

How much is too much? That's a question Colorado farmers and preservationists are asking as the United States Army's Fort Carson establishes plans to expand a 236,000-acre maneuver site by as much as 417,000 acres as part of a possible long-term plan to acquire nearly two million acres.

"The site they already have is being underused," says Lon Robertson, president of the Pinon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition. "They already have so much land. What is that they have to do that they can't do on the land they already have?"

11 Most

Traditionally called the Purgatorie River Region, the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site was given its name by the military in 1983, when it first acquired the land—an acquisition that came at a price.

"In 1983, a number of people were displaced by eminent domain, and it was a really awful time," says Rebecca Goodwin of the coalition. "Several landowners lost their land in that taking, and they have since purchased nearby land that is again at risk of being lost if the army's current area of interest becomes a reality."

The military's first acquisition had more than just a human impact. Included in the original land taking was the largest North American dinosaur track site, containing 1,300 dinosaur footprints. The track site was transferred into the care of the U.S. Forest Service in 1991, but more than 2,040 other archeologically and culturally significant sites remain within the boundaries of military control, 406 of which are considered worthy for placement on the National Register of Historic Places, Goodwin says.

 The army's current area of interest spans at least two Southeastern Colorado counties, but the boundaries are subject to slight changes, according to ThomasWarren, director of environmental compliace at Fort Carson.

Ten years ago, an archaeological survey documented more than 70 sites that are now included in the army's area of interest: from petroglyphs and pictographs to archaic period pit houses and historic ranches, passed down through generations. The area of interest includes the homestead of early Hispanic settlers and dozens of small cemeteries. The Mountain Branch of the Santa Fe Trail, a major trade route between Saint Louis and the Southwest, is included in the proposed expansion as well.

"The small survey serves as an indicator of the richness and density of sites in the region,h says Goodwin, gbut there are thousands of pre-historic, archeological sites throughout the proposed expansion.h

The Santa Fe Trail and the Southeast Cultural Region were placed on Colorado Preservation, Inc.'s list of most endangered historic sites in February of this year. The canyon also made the National Trust for Historic Preservation's list of America's 11 Most Endangered Historic Places this year.

"Ruts from the wagons are still visible [on the Mountain Branch], serving as evidence of westward expansion and the effects of heavy vehicles on the terrain," Goodwin says.

If a wagon nearly 200 years ago can leave a lasting mark on the rugged terrain, what will military machinery do to the land? We may soon find out.

According to Warren, the training requirements of today are not what they will be in five to 10 years. "We are planning for those future requirements. We are making efforts to evaluate training needs based on what the next war fought will be like."

Today the maneuver site is being used for the training necessary to prepare soldiers to fight in Iraq and Iran: "small arms, rifle and handgun practice, convoy operations, role play training, and long distances training," says Warren.

When the army originally acquired the site in 1983 they had promised they would never use live fire and they would never expand. Both of these promises have since been broken, with live fire first resounding through the land two years ago. Residents of South Eastern Colorado are getting worried that the army may go forward with plans regardless of opposition.

"They [the army] have been very vague. They do not speak to any of the landowners or county commissioners," Goodwin says. "The maps showing the area of interest include entire towns that would be completely displaced. They refuse to speak to anyone that it is going to effect."

While Warren declined to comment on the human impact of the proposed expansion other than to say that eminent domain was used in 1983, he did say that the army "must comply with every state regulation; this includes cultural resource protection and conservation where the resources can be conserved."

Preservationists and Coloradan citizens worry about what will happen to all of the archeological, cultural, and historic sites within the area of interest should the army expand.

"If the army takes control, the sites will be damaged. If you put heavy equipment and live fire on the sites they will be damaged. The public won't have access and that is part of our national heritage," Goodwin says.

Warren says that the army is well aware of the significance of sites included within the area of interest, and it ensures the protection of those areas.

Before the first line can even be drawn in an expansion, the army must first release an Environmental Impact Statement, a process that will take anywhere from 18 to 24 months, according to Warren.

In evaluating the land and the impact an expansion would have on the land, the army can determine how best to handle the archeological sites. "We survey, we identify and protect," says Warren. "We do not remove things from their natural settings unless they are in imminent danger of being lost through erosion and natural processes. Significant resources are restricted from the training or incorporated into the training scenario."

However, the expansion is not much more than a speck on the horizon right now. In mid-June, the U.S. House passed an amendment that would ban funds for the army to plan or expand the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site. Now the amendment awaits Senate action which will likely occur in September.

Despite many obstacles in the way to expansion, those in opposition are not hopeful.

"Even if the Senate does pass the amendment, they aren't going to stop," says Roberston. "We may delay them for a year, but they are going to keep going."

Fort Carson and the army await Senate action, but Warren asserts that "the reality of a need to train uniformed personnel is not going to wane. Military training facilities are always going to be needed. It is incumbent on the citizens of this country to evaluate the need and make the decisions."

Sign up for our free weekly e-newsletter >>

Recent Stories

  • New Orleans is using FEMA money to clearcut houses against homeowners' wishes - Aug. 10, 2007
  • High property taxes are forcing historic oceanfront amusement parks out of business - Aug. 3, 2007
  • Branson's Spaceport will bring changes to an ancient New Mexico road - July 27, 2007
  • Developers blend New Urbanism and historic preservation - July 20, 2007
  • How the 76 ball was saved - July 13, 2007
  • Santa Monica landmarks the birthplace of modern skateboarding - July 6, 2007
  • Poems and buildings are being resurrected at Angel Island Immigration Station - June 29, 2007
  • Charleston hopes to save its beloved blacksmith's home and workshop - June 22, 2007
  • The National Park Service vows to restore Idaho's Minidoka Internment Camp - June 15, 2007
  • McMansions on hold: Some towns fight back with moratoriums - June 8, 2007
  • Pa. town debates a subdivision on its golf course - June 1, 2007
  • A Hollywood star's estate becomes a public beach club - May 25, 2007
  • How Sanborn fire maps can guide restorations - May 18, 2007
  • A Nashville poster company keeps its letterpress going - May 11, 2007
  • Beyond Graceland: Where the music lives - May 4, 2007
  • What to do when historic houses flood - Apr. 27, 2007
  • Painted wall signs are fading, but is restoration the answer? - Apr. 20, 2007
  • How TDRs can help and hurt historic buildings - Apr. 13, 2007
  • How Lancaster County preserves its farmland - Apr. 6, 2007
  • A California playground gets a second chance - Mar. 30, 2007
  • Searching for Japantown - Mar. 23, 2007
  • Lost ballparks - Mar. 16, 2007
  • Before & After - Mar. 9, 2007
  • Saving the gardens of Alcatraz - Mar. 2, 2007
  • More preservation groups offer classes to real-estate agents - Feb. 23, 2007
  • One man's dream to restore a Little Rock neighborhood - Feb. 16, 2007
  • What one city did with its farm on Chicago's North Shore - Feb. 9, 2007
  • What will happen to historic military bases set to close in four years? - Feb. 2, 2007
  • Lost in L.A. - Jan. 26, 2007
  • Surfers, erosion, and New York's oldest lighthouse - Jan. 19, 2007
  • The automats, once a New York institution, are dying out - Jan. 12, 2007
  • New Orleans activists blog against unwarranted demolitions - Jan. 5, 2007
  • Best & Worst of 2006 - Dec. 29, 2006

    More Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>

  • All Rights Reserved    © Preservation Magazine    Contact Us