| Crowded Houses
On a New York City beach, high-rises
are replacing historic waterfront bungalowsdespite laws
that protect them.

Story by Lisa Selin Davis / Oct. 10, 2003

Printer-friendly
version

 |
|
Rockaway Beach's bungalows stretch to the ocean. (Tim Davis)
|
Known as the poor man's Riviera, Rockaway Beach—a
thin 7.5-mile snake of sand that hugs the coastline of Queens
and Brooklyn in New York City—was once the summer home of the
Vanderbilts, the Longfellows and the Astors. In the 1920s, many
of these grand estates were divided and sold to developers, who
built small communities in the popular architectural style of
the time, and the bungalow colonies of Far Rockaway, N.Y., were
born.
Now those beachfront bungalows and their public
waterfronts are endangered: Only 100 of the 300 original houses
remain. Dwarfed by massive new buildings—80 percent of all Queens
nursing homes reside in Far Rockaway, and sprawling housing projects
continue to grow, despite public easements—and unprotected by
landmark status, the fate of these last bungalows is still up
in the air. Though both national and New York City legislation
mandates preservation and compatible development, the laws don't
work unless someone enforces them.
 |
| Richard George in his bungalow, with high-rises
in his back yard (Tim Davis) |
That is precisely why Richard George, president
of the Beachside Bungalow Preservation Association of Far Rockaway,
Inc. (BBPA) is suing New York City's planning department and department
of buildings, claiming they have violated their own initiatives.
Founded 20 years ago, the association has tried a number of tactics
to promote preservation. "Once I had to come and stand right in
front of a bulldozer," George says. That was in 2001, and until
last year, the city was still approving demolition permits. So
George's group is taking the fight off the construction site and
into the courtroom to protect the integrity of this humble neighborhood.
Rockaway Beach's six-mile boardwalk (the country's
second longest, after Atlantic City, N.J.,) was once adorned with
bathhouses and brothels, amusement parks and luxury hotels, which
bloomed to life in the summer and were left sleeping for the winter.
But during post-World War II expansion, Rockaway experienced the
same decline that faced nearby places like the Bronx or Jersey
City: Suburban settlements bypassed areas directly outside the
metropolitan center, leaving boroughs subject to blight.
Their location, 20 miles from Manhattan, makes the
bungalows particularly difficult to protect. Anthony C. Wood,
longtime New York preservation activist, supports Richard George
and his heroic efforts to save the houses. "These bungalows are
really diamonds in the rough," he says. "Part of getting people
on board is to get them to see the buildings, to fall in love
with them. But the fact that they are so physically remote makes
it hard. If they were in Manhattan, there'd be an army to protect
them."
 |
|
Dwarfed in Rockaway Beach
(Tim Davis)
|
Many of the bungalows in this neighborhood—stretching
from Beach 24th St. to Beach 27th St. between Seagirt Boulevand
and the boardwalk in the Wavecrest area of Far Rockaway—were designed
as soldier's housing in nearby Gravesend, then hauled by barge
around the bay after World War I. The colony, built 80 years ago
on the site of what was once the Dickerson estate, served as a
humble summer retreat until its comeback in the mid-1980s.
The Beachside Bungalow Preservation Association
was established in 1984, when year-round residents started to
trickle into Rockaway Beach. But at the same time that the houses
were at last owned instead of rented, and properly tended, development
sprouted all around them. The 1918 deed from the four-acre Dickerson
estate clearly affirms that an easement—guaranteeing public access
to the waterfront—be preserved, but it wasn't until bungalows
were demolished and easements violated that the association sprung
into action.
In 1988, property owner Zion Halilli sold off his
one-acre waterfront parcel to developers, who razed more than
50 bungalows on three city blocks. "They did it in the winter,
when most of us weren't around," George says. "By the time we
got back in the spring, they were gone." Yet the lot remained
empty until 1998.
That's when the New York State Housing Trust Fund
Corporation received an application from the Queens-based Margert
Community Corporation to erect a multi-story apartment building
there called Wavecrest II, despite the colony's easement. Magert
originally promised garden apartments but later decided the building
would contain 122 units of low-income housing.
"If public easements are ignored, it paves the way
for the place to be chopped up, for further erosion," Wood says.
"The sense of place is kind of what hangs in the balance."
 |
Built on the site of 50 demolished bungalows,
Wavecrest II looms above a modest bungalow.
(Tim Davis) |
Although the association challenged the application
on the grounds that it would illegally usurp public access to
the waterfront and violate federal and city laws, it was too late.
Many Queens political heavy hitters, including former Borough
President Claire Shulman and Assemblywoman Audrey Pheffer, supported
the Wavecrest II application.
No one seemed concerned with the impact a six-story
building would have on the modest neighborhood of one-and-a-half
story, single-family homes—or with the legal clause that requires
appropriate development. Neither did officials consider the easement,
the right to ease, accommodation, and privilege to use land owned
by another person. Both Margert and the city's planning department
refused to comment for this story.
According to the Coastal Zone Management Act, which
Congress passed in 1972, one section, Title 16, Chapter 33, Sec.
1452, states should give "full consideration to ecological, cultural,
historic, and esthetic values as well as the needs for compatible
economic development" and maintain "public access to the coasts
for recreation purposes" while assisting "in the redevelopment
of deteriorating urban waterfronts and ports, and sensitive preservation
and restoration of historic, cultural, and esthetic coastal features."
 |
|
Rockaway Beach juxtaposition
(Tim Davis)
|
The New York City Waterfront Revitalization Program
(WRP), adopted in 1982 and revised in 1999, is the city's own
version of the Coastal Zone Management Act, intended to locally
enforce the national act. In its own charter, the program states,
"The guiding principal of the WRP is to maximize the benefits
derived from economic development, environmental preservation,
and public use of the waterfront, while minimizing the conflicts
among these objectives. Through individual project review, the
WRP aims to promote activities appropriate to various waterfront
locations."
But if compatible development balanced with aesthetic
values is the goal of the law, the reality is quite different.
Today Wavecrest II hovers over the bungalows, violating their
easements and spreading its pink brick wings across Beach 14th
Street. Yet if the BBPA has its way, that will all change.
"They built private property on a public easement,"
George says. "The Coastal Zone Management Act says development
has to be compatible with the character of the neighborhood, and
they did not properly conduct a detailed environmental impact
study. So the project is null and void." The association wants
the city to restore the easements, perhaps even removing developments
like Wavecrest, and protect the bungalows from future demolition.
It hopes to require the city to review past applications and reverse
inappropriate and illegal development.
"There are precedents for this sort of action,"
Wood says. He's referring to the "too-tall" tower at 108 East
96th Street that, due to a zoning error by the department of buildings,
was forced to demolish its top 12 floors.
It could be months, even years, before the lawsuit
is decided. But in the meantime, development on public easements
and demolition of bungalows has temporarily come to a halt. Key
city players are now behind his association, George says. "We
even had the Astors come out here and give us support," he says.
"Just like in the old days."
Lisa Selin Davis is a freelance writer in New
York.
Recent Stories
Empty
state prisons find a new raison d'etre
- Oct. 3, 2003
What does a listing on the National Register really mean?
- Sept. 26, 2003
Paving the road to ruin?
- Sept. 12, 2003
Mosques in America
- Sept. 5, 2003
Standoff
ends in San Diego: Two cottages saved from demolition by neglect
- Aug. 29, 2003
Rails
with trails: The ideal solution -
Aug. 22, 2003
Maine's Swan Island, protected as a wildlife refuge, is under attack
- Aug. 15, 2003
A New Yorker's quest to find and preserve
Grand Central Station's iron eagles
- Aug. 8, 2003
Manhattan
preservationists object to the renovation of Two Columbus Circle
- Aug. 1, 2003
A castle,
part of a historic winery, languishes on California's coast
- July 25, 2003
A Chicago
hospital flatlines - July 18, 2003
More
Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>
|