Home
Subscribe
About the Trust
Advertising
About Us
Search

Archives: March/April 2004

Front and Center

Closing historic doors robs us of the wonderful rite of entry.

BY DWIGHT YOUNG

If you ask me, the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts in Richmond is one of the best institutions of its kind in the country. I go there whenever I can, even though I resent having to slip in through the back door.

In the center of its Palladian facade, built in the 1930s, the museum has a handsome entrance that once ushered visitors into an equally handsome hall. But when the building was greatly expanded some years ago, a new circulation plan was implemented and the old formal entrance was padlocked. Today, instead of walking in from a tree-lined sidewalk along one of Richmond's grand boulevards, museumgoers enter from the parking lot out back.

Richmond isn't the only place where this kind of skullduggery is afoot. Here in Washington, a new underground visitors center at the U.S. Capitol will route visitors away from the monumental entrance at the top of the East Front steps. Better for security? Sure. Awe-inspiring? Not so much. Across town, the Corcoran Gallery is planning a billowy, silver-skinned new wing by architect Frank Gehry; once it's built, it's sure to become the museum's main entrance, which means that the old neoclassical portal, flanked by noble bronze lions, will be rendered redundant. Worse has already happened at the National Archives, where the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are displayed. A recent refurbishment has left the building looking great—but with its original front door blocked off. Visitors used to enter from the Mall by ascending a grand flight of steps and passing through a majestic Corinthian portico; now they scuttle inside, insectlike, through a door under the stairs.

This is not just another I-liked-it-better-the-way-it-used-to-be rant. I believe that when historic buildings start playing switcheroo with their entrances, something important gets lost.

In decades past, architects viewed the arrangement and decoration of interior spaces as an opportunity to shape and manage the viewer's experience of the building. In each deftly orchestrated composition, the entrance was the overture, intended to provide a sense of anticipation, to put you in the proper frame of mind for what the building was about to reveal, or even to surprise you. In many of Frank Lloyd Wright's early houses, for instance, the front door leads into a low-ceilinged hall that coddles you with coziness—but then you walk into a lofty, light-filled living room where the sudden explosion of space is gasp-inducing. Enter through the back door and you miss out on the drama that Wright planned so carefully.

There's not much anticipatory drama at the Archives. Previously, when you climbed all those steps and walked between those colossal columns and up to that Goliath-sized doorway, you sensed that you were about to exchange the workaday world for something important and noble. Now you just step into the basement—they call it the ground floor, but I know a basement when I see one—and while you're trying to find the Declaration of Independence ("go down the hall to the left, then left again, and take the elevator"), you're pretty sure that one wrong turn will deposit you in the boiler room. Similarly, the idea of a stage-managed procession from the city street to the realm of art gets short shrift at the Virginia Museum. The former entry hall, intended as an architectural fanfare for the rest of the building, has become a dead-end space that many visitors never see. The old entrance was dignified, appealing to the eye and mind, linking the museum with the neighborhood. The current one is primarily a canopied, airport-style pick-up and drop-off zone designed to meet the needs of cars and their drivers.

This opens a prospect that fills me with dread. I remember hearing about a funeral parlor where they prop up the coffin in a big window so that the bereaved can pay their respects to the Dear Departed without leaving their cars. Sooner or later, someone is sure to think of applying the same principle to museums, and then the buildings won't need public entrances at all. In the meantime, I'm creating a Society for Keeping the Front Door Open.

Read more from our current issue online, look for the March/April 2004 on newsstands, e-mail us to purchase a copy, or subscribe to the magazine.

All Rights Reserved    © Preservation Magazine    Contact Us