Throw Out the Architrash
America is in thrall to cutting
edgistas.
BY JAMES HOWARD KUNSTLER
Andres Duany, the urbanist and architect,
once remarked that you could stand at the center of
any American downtown and see many excellent buildings
dating from before World War II but find hardly any
bad onesand that from the same vantage, you
could see any number of perfectly horrible post-World
War II buildings and probably not find a single good
one.
The sad state of urban America, from the small town
to the metropolis, has sent a terrible message to
the public, which is that we are inept, that our every
attempt to build anything new results in some kind
of failure and disappointment, and worse, that this
is to be expected as the absolute norm. Worst
of all, it has destroyed the confidence that our culture
is even capable of delivering a future worth living
in. Where building is concerned, we are all cynics
now.
For decades, the siting of new buildings has tended
toward the abysmally antiurban. We tuck office towers
behind ridiculous landscaping fantasias (to conceal
the absence of retail on the ground floor), which
confuses things further by ruralizing the city. The
amount of municipal money wasted on juniper shrubs
and bark mulch, for instance, is out of this world.
We stick apartment towers on dreary blank-wall masonry
podiums that act like fortifications. More commonly,
we isolate buildings in parking lagoons to accommodate
our tragic national addiction to cars. All these things
degrade the quality of civic life.
There have been signal improvements in reforming and
raising the standards of urban design all over America
the past 10 years, largely due to the dogged work
of the New Urbanists, led by Duany and others. These
days, new buildings in a downtown are likely to meet
the sidewalk properly and even include something more
compelling than blank walls, dwarf evergreens, or
concrete plantersnamely, retail trade. But
architectural standards for the buildings themselves
almost always lag far behind. That is to say, the
relationship between buildings and the public realm
has improved, but the buildings themselves often still
suck out loud.
For more of this story,
subscribe
to the magazine, look for the November/December
2005 issue on newsstands, or e-mail
us to purchase a copy.
Read more excerpts from our current
issue.
|