Faithfully Ours
Historic houses of worship anchor and enliven communities worldwide.
BY DWIGHT YOUNG
 |
Order
Dwight Young's new book, Road Trips Through
History, 54 of the best "Back Page" essays
|
Funny thing about Moscow: Every time
I visit the city, there are more old churches than
there used to be.
Like Kazan Cathedral. When I visited
Moscow's Red Square recently on a National Trust study
tour, Kazan caught my eye right away. It's such a
striking little building—tall bell tower, gilded dome,
wedding-cake tiers of ogee gables, peachy-pink stucco
walls—that I couldn't understand why I'd never noticed
it before. Then my guidebook explained it all: Originally
consecrated in 1637, the church was razed in 1936
on orders from Stalin, who apparently wanted to make
it easier for tanks and troops to enter Red Square
for the annual May Day parades. The current cathedral,
a faithful replica of the original, was completed
in the early 1990s.
Later, our tour took us to the Cathedral
of Christ the Redeemer, a marble mountain that looms
above the Moscow River not far from the Kremlin. When
I say "looms," I mean it: For many years
after its completion in 1883, it was the tallest structure
in Moscow, and it still dominates the skyline by virtue
of its sheer bulk, its snowy whiteness, and its five
golden domes. Like Kazan, today's Christ the Redeemer
is brand-new. The original was demolished in 1931
to make way for a Palace of Soviets that was to have
boasted a 1,000-foot tower topped with a 300-foot
statue of Lenin. That monstrosity was never built,
and the site later hosted the world's biggest outdoor
swimming pool—which was eventually closed, according
to one story, after it was discovered that paintings
in the nearby Pushkin Museum were being damaged by
the clouds of steam that rose from the heated pool
in winter. With support from the Russian government
and funding from public and private sources in several
countries, the new cathedral was almost finished in
time for the celebration of Moscow's 850th anniversary
in 1997.
Construction of these two churches was
costly (the price tag for Christ the Redeemer is said
to have been well over $200 million), and it came
at a time when the Russian economy was floundering
and millions of people were in dire need of jobs and
decent housing. So why were they built? Are religious
buildings really that important?
Of course they are.
When I visited Kazan Cathedral, a service
was in progress. Inside, the church was alive with
the soaring music of the choir, the flicker of candles,
the rich smell of incense; outside, the city streets
echoed with the joyous bong, clang, and tinkle of
bells. At Christ the Redeemer, throngs of visitors,
Russians and foreigners, gaped at the bright murals
and shiny marble, aware that the building symbolizes
Russia's return to its roots—perhaps even the reclamation
of its true soul—after decades of repression.
Like their predecessors in centuries
past, these new churches are summoning and sheltering
the faithful, ornamenting and enlivening the urban
environment, taking people out of their daily lives
and into someplace high and deep and meaningful. That's
what houses of worship have long done, whether they
stand in Russia or Bolivia or Senegal or Thailand
or the U.S.A.
In this country we need sacred places—for
the range of services they offer people in need, for
the sense of stability and identity they provide to
our communities, for the diversity they promote as
a group, for what they say about us as a nation founded
on the principle of religious freedom. That's why
the Trust included urban
houses of worship in this year's 11-most-endangered
list.
When a building gets demolished, Americans
generally assume it's gone for good. Not the Russians:
When their churches got smashed, people knew they
had lost something important—so they recreated them.
Maybe that was the right thing to do. I don't know.
I do know that we owe it to ourselves to ensure that
our historic churches, synagogues, mosques, and meetinghouses
aren't torn down in the first place. America's soul—interpret
that any way you choose—becomes a bit poorer every
time one of them disappears.
Read more from our current
issue online, look for the September/October
2003 issue on newsstands, e-mail
us to purchase a copy, or subscribe
to the magazine.
|