The New Suburbanism
Lost in the illusion of small-town America
BY SUDIP BOSE
In a mild winter afternoon nearly three
years ago, I got home from work earlier than usual
and, with the day clinging to the last glimmer of
pale sunlight, decided to go for a run. Having lived
for only a month in the Kentlands—a suburban
Maryland community some 20 miles northwest of Washington,
D.C.—I did not know the neighborhood very well.
My intent was to explore it during a 30-minute jog
before returning home for dinner.
I set off slowly, crossed the busy boulevard that
bisects the development, and made my way to a network
of residential streets. The Kentlands is considered
one of the great successes of the New Urbanist movement,
which has seen the rise of planned communities built
according to traditional neighborhood design principles,
and the houses I passed were the revivals typical
of such developments—brick Georgians and wood
colonials, Federal row houses and ornate Victorians—with
lampposts, front porches, and pristine picket fences.
If I hadn't known that most of those houses had
been built in the 1990s, I would have thought I had
stumbled upon some idyllic New England village.
The run was invigorating. I turned left down one street,
then right on another, took a few more lefts and a
few more rights, running faster as evening turned
to chilly night. I found myself staring into the houses,
spying the silhouettes of families in their illuminated
living rooms as if I were some fleet-footed flâneur,
but I started to tire, my rhythm slowed, and I decided
to turn back. Only then, with a slight burn in the
backs of my legs, taking in the cold air in short,
hard breaths, did I realize that I was lost.
For more of this article, look for the September/October
2005 issue on newsstands, e-mail
us to purchase a copy, or subscribe
to the magazine. More
from our current issue >>
|