 |
|
(Tony Baker)
|
The Short Answer: Jim Bouton
Former New York Yankee 21-game winner,
best-selling author (Ball Four, 1970), ABC
and CBS sportscaster, and film actor, Jim Bouton in
2003 wrote Foul Ball, which chronicles the
fight to save 113-year-old Wahconah Park, a stadium
in Pittsfield, Mass. The update, Foul Ball, Plus
Part II, was published in August.
What makes a great ballpark?
It has to have some history, some charm, and some
idiosyncrasies. It can't be a cookie-cutter shape.
There have to be parts that affect play differently
than in other parks. For example, the Polo Grounds
in Manhattan had very short right and left field lines,
and centerfield ballooned out to about 500 feet. The
Green Monster at Fenway Park in Boston is another
perfect example.
What is special about Wahconah
Park?
It is one of the last of the wood ballparks, and baseball
has been played there since 1892. It's misshapen
due to the Housatonic River. You can hit a 400-foot
shot to right-center field and it gets caught, but
if you hit a 380-foot shot to straightaway center,
it's over the fence. Also, the park faces west.
The sun shines in the batters' eyes, and they
have to call time out for five to 10 minutes, depending
on how fast the sun drops behind the trees. It's
called a sun delay, but we call it "Mother Nature's
marketing opportunity"—to send people to
the stands to buy more beer.
What drove you and your friend
Chip Elitzer to try to save Wahconah?
It seemed like an adventure. We were following the
progress of this old ballpark and the battle in Pittsfield.
We thought we could put together investors, renovate
the place, and get our own minor league team. And
then, of course, when we got involved, it became more
intriguing because we ran into opposition.
Who were the opponents?
The mayor, the city council, the mayor's handpicked
parks commissioners, the town's only daily newspaper,
its largest bank, and its most powerful law firm.
These guys, the power brokers, wanted a new stadium
in the center of town on property owned by the newspaper
while everybody else—or approximately 94 percent
of the people of Pittsfield—wanted their old
ballpark.
Why did you write Foul Ball?
When I realized Pittsfield's baseball destiny was
in the hands of a guy in Denver named Dean Singleton,
who owns MediaNews Group, parent company of the local
Berkshire Eagle newspaper, I said I'd better
start taking notes here; this is too bizarre. It got
even more bizarre as time went on, and the notes became
a book.
What happened after the book was
published?
In 2004, Chip and I were invited back to save the
old ballpark by the new mayor, a new city council,
and new parks commissioners. The idea was to raise
all of our investment money and renovate the park
that summer, so we could be ready for opening day
2005. Once again, the power structure forced us out.
Are your opponents still hoping
to build a new downtown ballpark?
They work behind the scenes and aren't forthcoming
about their intentions. They just wanted us out.
In the past 10 to 15 years, why
have so many old stadiums been razed or fallen into
disuse and been replaced by new ones?
There's a lot more money to be made in building
new than in renovating. Renovating takes a certain
amount of taste and skill and care, and most of these
people in favor of new stadiums are of the bulldozer
mentality—flatten it and start from scratch.
What are the biggest obstacles
to saving these old parks?
The power structure in towns large and small—politicians
and businessmen—fights to keep referendums off
the ballot because they know the people would never
go for them.
In Foul Ball, you favor using private
funds to build new parks. Why?
If building or renovating a stadium is a good idea
from a business perspective, let the businessmen pay
for it. Why should taxpayers have to subsidize a baseball
stadium if they don't even go to the games? It's
a national outrage, considering that you have schools,
hospitals, and fire departments without proper funding.
How about the mostly private-funded
plan for a new Yankee Stadium?
George Steinbrenner and the other owners are just
custodians. They come and go. I didn't like the
renovation they did in the 1970s; it looks like somebody
jammed a new stadium into an old one. Now they're
going to tear the whole thing down and build across
the street. I mean, come on! Who would tear St. Patrick's
Cathedral down and build another one across the street
with better confessional booths? And why is the city
giving them the land and putting in subway stops?
Even if the team were struggling—and they're
certainly not—the owners should offer those improvements.
Fenway Park has finally been saved.
Can you comment on this?
It was an uphill battle, but that's the one good
story in the whole country right now. Read
more about Fenway on Preservation Online >>
Subscribe
to the magazine, look for the September/October
2005 issue on newsstands, or e-mail
us to purchase a copy.
Read more excerpts from our current
issue >>
|