Oregon's Measure 37 Invalid,
Judge Rules

Story by Margaret Foster / Oct. 25, 2005

Printer-friendly
version

 |
The owner of Marr Ranch, near Chief Joseph's
burial site, has filed a Measure 37 claim in order to
build an RV camp there. (Ellen Morris Bishop)
|
An Oregon judge shocked the state—and the country—this
month when she overturned the controversial Measure 37, a property-rights
law voters passed last November.
On Oct. 14, Marion County Circuit Judge Mary James
ruled that the state law violates the state and federal constitutions.
Measure 37, which says that government "must pay
owners, or forgo enforcement, when certain land use restrictions
reduce property value," helps some landowners, James ruled, but
treats others unfairly. For example, under the new law, developers
can build on land next to working farms, lowering their property
value.
The decision, which will likely be appealed, responds
to a lawsuit, MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services,
filed in January by former Senator Hector MacPherson, landowners,
farmers, and the preservation group 1,000 Friends of Oregon.
"We were very pleased but not as surprised as the
rest of the state was," says Bob Stacey, executive director of
1,000 Friends of Oregon. "More and more Oregonians are becoming
concerned that Measure 37 didn't strike a balance between land-use
planning and property rights," says Stacey, whose group wants
the state to replace the now-invalid statute with a law that compensates
landowners based on actual loss of property value, not potential
losses.
Preservationists and others objected to the law
in part because it opens the door to development. Since the measure
passed, landowners have filed "Measure 37 claims"—requests for
compensation or exemption from land-use laws—to build a strip
mall and houses on Willamette Valley farmland; build houses in
vineyards of Yamhill County; build houses in the pear orchards
of Hood River County; and build houses
near Chief Joseph's burial site. Read more >>
"Measure 37 gave a blanket right to property owners
based on the date they bought their property and nothing more,"
Stacey says. "It has resulted in a complete windfall to those
property owners. For every property owner who hits the jackpot
with the new Measure 37 claims, new victims are being created."
Want Today's News headlines delivered to your e-mail
box? Sign up for
our weekly e-newsletter >>
|  |