Growing Pains
As Portland Plans To Revitalize a Historic District,
Some Say There's Such a Thing as Standing Too Tall.

Story by Jane Lotter / Mar. 24, 2006

Printer-friendly
version

 |
| Portland's historic Skidmore neighborhood may be changed forever by high-rise development. (Barbara McIntyre/Portland Oregon Visitors Association)
|
Portland, Ore., is often called one of the prettiest cities
in the Northwest. Straddling the Willamette River, with Mt. Hood dominating
its horizon, the metropolis is celebrated for its low-rise buildings,
unobscured views, and exceptional urban planning.
But Portland is changing. Skyscrapers are sprouting, particularly
in the city's South Waterfront area. Perhaps growth is inevitable in a
city second only to Seattle as the largest in the Pacific Northwest. Nevertheless,
some Portland residents are troubled by a proposal to allow high rises
in the oldest part of the city, the Skidmore/Old Town Historic District.
Known for its 19th-century architecture, the area, often
simply called Skidmore, is listed on the National Register of Historic
Places. It's currently zoned at a height limit of 75 feet. However, as
part of a city-sponsored redevelopment plan for the area, the Berkeley-based
consulting firm Moore Iacofano Goltsman (MIG), Inc., which has a branch
office in Portland, recently recommended permitting new construction in
Skidmore up to 140 feet, albeit near the edges of the district.
Portland resident and developer John Russell opposes high
rises in Skidmore. He was on the Landmarks Commission some 30 ago when
it worked to create the Skidmore/Old Town historic district.
"The theory then," Russell says, "was that
[future] infill buildings would recreate the mass and height of the historic
buildings. And that you would know, when you crossed the boundary of the
district, where you were."
In other words, the fin-de-siècle sense of place
one feels when standing on the street in Skidmore is based not only on
the area's impressive collection of masonry and cast-iron buildings in
the late Victorian style. It's also based on the amount of sky overhead.
Skidmore is often called "the heart of Portland,"
but parts of it have been rundown for decades. And with roughly 40 percent
of its land vacant (mostly surface parking lots), no one questions that
the area is ripe for infill and revitalization. That's why in the summer
of 2005 the city created the Ankeny/Burnside Development Framework to
establish "urban design and development goals for public and private
investments over the next five years in the Ankeny Plaza/Burnside Bridge
area" as well as throughout the rest of the district.
A joint undertaking of the Portland Bureau of Planning and
the Portland Development Commission (PDC), the Ankeny/Burnside Development
Framework has a lengthy agenda. Its long-term goals for Skidmore intertwine
with those of other City studies and agencies and include facilitating
the design of a new fire station, creating a Portland Public Market, finding
a permanent home for the area's popular Saturday Market, redeveloping
the historic Globe Hotel, and encouraging private development of 1,000
units of residential infill development. And that's just a partial list.
But while the city is eager to help with planning and support,
the actual hands-on redevelopment of Skidmore is largely beyond the city's
budget, meaning it will take substantial private investment to bring the
area back to life.
"It would be going too far to say there will be zoning
changes [in Skidmore]," says Joe Zehnder, project co-manager in the
bureau of planning. "[But MIG is suggesting] that allowing additional
height is a way to make residential development more feasible."
The City wants 1,000 new residential units in Skidmore,
and developers want projects that pencil out. For developers, one way
to increase their return on investment is to construct taller buildings
containing more housing units. MIG has also suggested developers could
pay for increased height allowances, thus creating funds for historic
preservation elsewhere in Skidmore.
Amy Miller Dowell, project co-manager, PDC, readily acknowledges
that MIG's proposal is "controversial." She points out, however,
that of 13 blocks targeted for redevelopment only sixat the very
edges of the districthave been put forward as candidates for high
rises. Even then, tall buildings would cover only portions of blocks,
not entire blocks.
According to Miller Dowell, the city's consultants are saying
that if new construction is held to a 75-foot limit, projects might not
be financially viable. Miller Dowell says the PDC has certainly heard
citizen concern over possible changes to the area's height restrictions.
"What we're hearing is that the historic district was set out to
protect that height, and there should be a strict demarcation," she
says. "And we're going to be taking that message back to the consultants."
In the meantime, John Russell, who's also a member of the
Ankeny/Burnside Development Framework stakeholders group, points out there's
a solid preservationist network in Portland (the National Trust held its
2005 National Preservation Conference there). He says there's growing
opposition to lifting height restrictions in any part of Skidmore, and,
in any event, both the planning commission and the city council would
first have to approve any zoning changes.
"I was aghast that [high-rises] would ever be considered,"
says Russell. "There are a number of us who are united in a view
that this would be a disaster. It would take the aspiration that the Landmarks
Commission had years ago when it designated [Skidmore] as a district and
completely dash that dream."
In putting together a plan for redeveloping Skidmore, the
Ankeny/Burnside project is doggedly investigating all possibilities. Indeed,
Miller Dowell says one alternative to high rises would be to simply "wait
for the [real estate] market to mature[eventually] you could build
a 75-foot-high residential project and it pencils."
Either way, Miller Dowell makes it clear that while the
suggestion of high rises in Skidmore remains on the table, "This
is a proposal that has not been vetted. We haven't agreed to it in any
way."
Jane Lotter is a freelance writer based in Seattle.
Sign
up for our free weekly e-newsletter >>
Recent Stories
Maine Shakers strike deal to preserve last farm
- Mar. 17, 2006
1,000-year-old
pieces of Spanish monastery are reconstructed in California
- Mar. 10, 2006
Painted
advertisements are disappearing, but is restoration the answer?
- Mar. 3, 2006
Back to school means work for Tulane University freshmen
- Feb. 24, 2006
Palauan
meeting houses, abandoned and obliterated, make a comeback
- Feb. 17, 2006
Retro gas stations restored - Feb. 10, 2006
Will stricter excavation rules help or hurt shipwrecks? - Feb. 3, 2006
What it takes to save one of Quantico's Lustron houses - Jan. 27, 2006
Boston
considers natural gas and wind turbine projects for its Harbor
Islands - Jan. 20, 2006
Months
after the Kelo decision, New London, Conn., is at a standstill
- Jan. 13, 2006
Best & Worst 2005
- Jan. 6, 2006
Connecticut tribe may raze historic building on burial ground
- Dec. 16, 2005
An
Underground Railroad site is on track to becoming a museum
- Dec. 9, 2005
The other side of Ellis Island
- Dec. 2, 2005
New Jersey's Doo Wop hotels turn out the lights
- Nov. 18, 2005
A Colorado town unearths a log cabin inside a house
- Nov. 4, 2005
Pennsylvanians fight a plan to build houses on a Revolutionary War POW camp
- Oct. 28, 2005
Cities convert historic parking garages to lofts or lots
- Oct. 21, 2005
New York City's first preservationist
- Oct. 14, 2005
The second lives of decommissioned battleships
- Oct. 7, 2005
After
a Martha Stewart renovation, Bunshaft's Travertine House was demolished
- Sept. 30, 2005
Hollywood and history square off in Tombstone, Ariz.
- Sept. 23, 2005
Hurricane Katrina shattered Mississippi's historic districts
- Sept. 16, 2005
Downeasters
celebrate the Pentagon's decision to spare a 19th-century shipyard
- Sept. 9, 2005
More
Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>
|