The Price Is Wright
Why some owners are having trouble selling
their Frank Lloyd Wright houses

Story from the magazine
by Salvatore Deluca / May 13, 2005

Printer-friendly
version

 |
The W.S. Carr House was
torn down on Nov. 9, 2004. (Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy)
|
In Grand Beach, Mich., about an hour
outside Chicago, a developer recently wanted to build a four-bedroom
house on a piece of land overlooking Lake Michigan. Standing in
the way, however, was a rickety summer cottage that had occupied
that location since 1916. An all-too-familiar story was played
out, and the
cottage was razed last November.
What's surprising about this particular
demolition, however, is that the cottage was the W.S. Carr House,
designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. Not since 1973, when the Arthur
Munkwitz apartments in Milwaukee came down as part of a road widening,
had one of Wright's structures been destroyed.
Wright's avant-garde dwellings are today more
often considered collector's items than places in which to live. And their
owners are finding it increasingly difficult to attract buyers who want
to preserve them because, paradoxically, Wright's structures are still
eminently functional.
"Wright designed for the times," says Ron Scherubel,
executive director of the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy, which
facilitates between eight and 10 sales of Wright-designed houses each
year. "The kitchen was a workspace, the bedroom a place to sleep." But
functionality isn't enough these days. Many people want big new houses,
and the typical Wright residence will not satisfy them.
 |
| In Cincinnati, one of Wright's 100 Usonian
houses was sold at auction in 2003 for $400,000. (Miriam Gosling) |
Aware of the intimate scale of the
houses he created, the architect, according to Scherubel, "would
encourage his clients to go out and buy a nice wooded lot." That
space, integral to the design of many Wright houses, is appealing
to developers today, given the growing scarcity of land in and
around cities.
"Now, 30, 40, 50 years after Wright designed
his houses," Scherubel says, "the threat of teardown is very significant
because those lots are so desirable."
Some homebuyers simply cannot come to terms
with Wright's modernist aesthetic. "Most Americans, like those brought
up in a faith, don't want to deviate from their parents' traditional homes,"
says Don Schaberg, a retired building supply plant owner in Okemos, Mich.,
who began trying last year to sell the house Wright built for him and
his wife in 1958. He's hoping to get about $1.6 million for it.
 |
|
The 1915 Emil Bach House
in Chicago sold at auction earlier this year. (Inland Real
Estate Auctions)
|
Location, too, has much to do with
success in selling a Wright residence. A pristine house in Oak
Park, Ill. (near downtown Chicago), for example, will command
a higher price-and sell with greater ease-than a house in the
same condition in rural Wisconsin listed at a lower price. Arlene
Moran, who owns the Wright-designed Eric Pratt House in Galesburg,
Mich., 170 miles from Chicago, hopes to get about $375,000 from
its sale. She paid $137,000 for it in 1992 and has put $180,000
into it since. And yet, there's been little serious interest in
the place in two years. Moran believes the commute to Chicago
or Detroit is too long and the house itself too far from Lake
Michigan to make for a suitable vacation home.
"If all Frank Lloyd Wright houses were around
Chicago and New York City," Scherubel says, "I think they'd all be bought
up in a matter of months."
Given those difficulties, some Wright enthusiasts
have had to get creative. Two owners, in Cincinnati and Chicago, have
elected to sell their houses at auction. And a Johnstown, Pa., band instructor
recently paid $100,000 to disassemble a Wright house in Illinois that
was slated for demolition, ship it back to Pennsylvania, and rebuild it
there.
Most owners of Wright-designed houses are aware
of the special responsibility that comes with living in such an environment.
When it comes to selling, finding a similarly minded buyer is just as
important as meeting an asking price. "My fear," Moran says, "is that
whoever buys my house is going to be renting it out. Have you ever known
a renter to take care of a place as if it was his own?"
Sign
up for our free weekly e-newsletter >>
Recent Stories
Thomas
Wolfe House reopens after a devastating fire
- May 6, 2005
Louis
Kahn's Trenton Bathhouse isn't the only one at risk
- Apr. 29, 2005
St.
Paul searches for a new use for its 150-year-old brewery
- Apr. 15, 2005
National
Parks restore their historic assets one season at a time
- Apr. 8, 2005
How
Carnegie libraries adapt to survive
- Apr. 1, 2005
Many
old gas stations are gone, but some have been renovated
- Mar. 25, 2005
The
Plaza Hotel's new owners plan to rearrange its interior for condos
and shops - Mar. 18, 2005
Architectural
conservators work as gumshoes to solve mysteries of old buildings
- Mar. 11, 2005
This
month, the IRS will auction a seized Colorado castle
- Mar. 4, 2005
An
African American family's neighborhood is Fort Worth's newest
historic district - Feb. 25, 2005
Moving
museums at Jack London's California ranch
- Feb. 18, 2005
A school
plans to build classrooms on a South Carolina plantation
- Feb. 11, 2005
Stiltsville,
an aquatic neighborhood surrounded by a national park, will survive
- Feb. 4, 2005
Hundreds
of octagon houses have outlasted an 1850s trend
- Jan. 28, 2005
Maine's
one-room schoolhouses represent a lost way of life
- Jan. 21, 2005
Finding
a new raison d'etre for the old cellblock
- Jan. 14, 2005
Palauan
meeting houses are making a comeback
- Jan. 7, 2005
Best
& Worst of 2004 - Dec. 31, 2004
More
Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>
|