Martha's Touch
After a Botched Renovation, Gordon Bunshaft's
Modern Home Was Demolished.

Story by David V. Griffin / Sept. 30, 2005

Printer-friendly
version

 |
| Ten years after the Museum
of Modern Art sold the Travertine House to Martha Stewart,
the gutted house was demolished. (Caroline Rob Zaleski) |
Martha Stewart is perhaps not the first person one
would associate with architect Gordon Bunshaft, the principal
of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. Responsible for such masterworks
as the the Lever House (1952) and the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript
Library at Yale University (1960), Bunshaft may seem at odds with
the Colonial revival coziness popularized by Stewart's magazines
and television programs.
Yet when the architect's own home, Travertine House,
was up for sale in 1994, Stewart was evidently smitten. "I'd
never seen the house," she told Brendan Gill of The New
Yorker upon buying the structure in 1995, adding that the
minute she had heard of it, "I wanted it—just like that!"
This unlikely love-at-first-sight scenario ended
last summer with the sale and demolition of the house, a rare
domestic project of the architect that had been described as one
of the country's most beautiful International-style structures.
Built in 1962 as Bunshaft's home, Travertine House
was a symmetrical, single-story structure 26 feet wide by 100
feet long that balanced stone-walled pavilions on either side
of a central glass-walled core. Incorporating double-T pre-stressed
concrete roof panels also employed in Bunshaft's Hirshhorn Museum
in Washington D.C. (1974), the house was designed to display his
significant collection of modern art, which included works by
Giacometti, Dubuffet, and Miro, situated throughout the house's
interior and 2.4-acre grounds.
 |
| Travertine House in September 2004, stripped
of its facade (Caroline Rob Zaleski) |
Travertine was "an important Modernist house,
unique in Bunshaft's career," says architecture critic Paul
Goldberger, who points out that it was a notable design even by
the standards of the architecturally distinguished Georgica Pond
area of the Hamptons, on Long Island.
Willed to the Museum of Modern Art along with the
architect's art collection after Bunshaft's death in 1990, the
house was sold to Stewart for $3.2 million in 1995 without any
protective covenants beyond what a MoMA spokeswoman, quoted by
the East Hampton Star in 2002 referred to as an offer "to
maintain the integrity" of the building.
Despite these seemingly exemplary intentions, Stewart
hired London architect John Pawson to redo the two-bedroom house.
Interior partitions and detailing were removed and windows boarded
up; a portion of the house's signature travertine floor was reportedly
removed and installed in the kitchen of Stewart's new Bedford,
N.Y., home—a perhaps more typically "Martha" complex
of New England saltbox-inspired architecture.
The renovation was halted, however, when Stewart
began feuding with neighbor Harry Macklowe, a real-estate developer
who contested Stewart's plans to build several outbuildings, claiming
they would block his view of the pond. The property was soon entangled
in lawsuits and rumors. Meanwhile, piles of dirt and rubble from
excavations on the site were left on the lawn of Travertine House
for so long that, according to visitors, they sprouted weeds.
The two-year-long dispute was finally settled in
2003. Macklowe's appeals were dismissed, and Stewart was granted
permission to renovate the studio and add three outbuildings to
the property. However, these projects were never restarted, and
the house, which Stewart had reportedly never spent a night in,
fell into further decay. (Stewart's publicist did not return requests
for information; MoMA confirmed the dates of the sale but declined
to comment.)
 |
|
(Caroline Rob Zaleski)
|
Soon after the ImClone insider-trading scandal broke,
Stewart transferred the property to her daughter, Alexis, who
then put the deteriorated house on the market for $10.5 million.
Last spring, Donald Maharam, a textiles magnate noted for reissues
of classic mid-century designs, purchased the waterfront house
for approximately $9.5 million.
Despite his interest in modernism, Maharam announced
that he was going to demolish the house. In a statement released
in June, Maharam described the structure as "decrepit and
largely beyond repair," claiming that Stewart's attempts
at renovation had ended with "substantial demolition of all
but the existing roof." Travertine House was demolished on
the last weekend of July.
In a neighborhood where new houses are normally
up to five times the size of Travertine House, Maharam's plans
for a new house are restrained by zoning ordinances that prevent
new construction from exceeding the Bunshaft building's original
footprint unless they are set back an additional 150 feet from
nearby protected wetlands—an impossibility given the shape of
the property. Maharam has decided to construct a modern building
"in the spirit of the former house."
Local preservationists, who had been optimistic
about the house given Stewart's apparent commitment, are still
asking how such a significant structure could have been allowed
to deteriorate. Bunshaft biographer Carol Krinsky says that the
house was more important as an ensemble work when considered with
the art collection and landscape: "There wasn't much left
to preserve."
But Michael Gotkin, director of the Modern Architecture
Working Group, doubts Maharam's assessment of the building as
unsalvageable. "Donald Maharam has made a small fortune by
reviving mid-century modern designers like Alexander Girard and
Irving Harper … it's too bad that he did not have the same regard
for Gordon Bunshaft."
Tom Killian, who worked with Bunshaft, criticizes
MoMA for not attempting to protect the house as part of its sale
to Stewart, pointing out that the house was left to MoMA. "Whatever
the Maharams and Ms. Stewart may have done, I feel that the museum
is the real culprit."
Whoever is to blame, it's clear that the house's
loss is "another blow against Modernism's sense of modesty
and direction and focus," Goldberger says. "I hope the
new design will not be another situation where this tradition
is sacrificed."
Sign
up for our free weekly e-newsletter >>
Recent Stories
Hollywood and history square off in Tombstone, Ariz.
- Sept. 23, 2005
Hurricane Katrina shattered Mississippi's historic districts
- Sept. 16, 2005
Downeasters
celebrate the Pentagon's decision to spare a 19th-century shipyard
- Sept. 9, 2005
Inside
the nation's only high school with a preservation-based curriculum
- Sept. 2, 2005
A developer keeps plans for Coney Island under wraps - Aug. 26, 2005
Few
visit the Walt Whitman House in Camden, N.J., but the city hopes
to change that - Aug. 19, 2005
Vertical Access goes to extremes for a close-up view of history
- Aug. 12, 2005
When Wal-Mart moves out, churches move in
- Aug. 5, 2005
Americans are using their vacations to do preservation work
- July 29, 2005
The rebirth of a Beaux-Arts landmark in Cleveland
- July 22, 2005
Some chain stores alter their typical design to fit into historic areas
- July 15, 2005
New York State is selling off its defunct hospitals, but one city objects to a sale
- July 8, 2005
The
queen of the St. Lawrence River opens to the public
- July 1, 2005
Historic horse-racing tracks struggle to stay in the race - June 24, 2005
Can
a new visitors center put the town that inspired "American Gothic"
on the map? - June 17, 2005
What the Basques left
- June 10, 2005
The
owner of a beloved Florida hotel wants to tear it down for condos
- June 3, 2005
More
Stories of the Week, only on Preservation Online >>
|